RESUMEN
Background. Patients receiving CAR-T therapy may have impaired humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations due to their high net state of immunosuppression associated with the underlying disease, prior lines of therapy and CAR-T treatment associated hypogammaglobinemia. Comprehensive data on vaccine immunogenicity in this patient population are currently lacking. Methods. A single-center retrospective study of adults receiving CD19 CAR-T therapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was conducted between 3/27/2018 - 8/31/ 2021. Patients received at least two doses of COVID-19 vaccinations with BNT162b2 (Pfizer, BioNTech), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), or 1 dose of Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen) and had SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike (S) levels measured at least one month after the last vaccine dose. We excluded patients who received COVID-19 monoclonal antibody therapy or immunoglobulin within 3 months of the index anti-S titer. Patients were followed from the time of the first COVID-19 vaccines through their index anti-S antibody result. Patients were censored on the first day of any additional antineoplastic therapy after disease relapse. Our primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who develop a positive anti-S response (assessed by anti-S assay cutoff of >0.8 U/mL, Roche assay). Results. Twenty-five patients met eligibility. Median age was 65 years (range 41 - 78), and majority of patients were male (72%). The number of patients with a positive antibody response was 12 (48%). Median number of vaccines received was 3. 18 patients (72%) received Pfizer vaccines, 4 patients (16%) received Moderna, 2 patients (8%) received Moderna and Pfizer, and 1 patient (4%) received Janssen and Pfizer. Median anti-S titers among patients with a positive response was 111 U/mL (range 2.44 - 12500). Two patients (8%) had COVID-19, both with negative anti-S responses. Conclusion. Our analysis shows that only 48% of patients who received CAR-T therapy developed a positive antibody response after at least two COVID-19 vaccine doses, with a low median titer among responders. This patient population is at higher risk for developing severe COVID-19 disease and likely remains vulnerable even after vaccination. Alternative approaches are needed to prevent COVID-19 and mitigate disease severity in patients undergoing CAR-T.
RESUMEN
Background: Remdesivir (RDV), a nucleotide analogue prodrug that inhibits viral RNA polymerases, has demonstrated potent in vitro and in vivo activity against SAR-CoV-2 and favorable clinical efficacy and tolerability in patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 Elevated transaminase levels are commonly seen in patients with severe COVID-19 prior to treatment Here we report safety and clinical outcomes after RDV treatment in patients with normal versus elevated baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels Methods: We conducted a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, involving hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia with Sat<94% Patients with screening ALT or AST> 5x the upper limit of normal (ULN) were excluded from the study Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either 5 or 10 days of intravenous RDV once daily We compared patients with baseline ALT below and above the ULN based on AASLD criteria (ALT 35 U/L for males and 25 U/L for females) Covariates for adjustment included age, sex, race and baseline oxygen support Clinical recovery and all-cause mortality were evaluated using logistic regression Clinical outcomes and adverse events (AEs) were assessed through day 28 Results: Of 397 patients treated with RDV, 215 (54%) had elevated baseline ALT Median ALT was 53 U/L (IQR: 40 - 78 U/L) in the high ALT group Patients with high ALT at time of RDV initiation were younger (median 58 vs 65 years, p<0 001), required less oxygen (p=0 02), and had longer symptom duration (median 10 vs 8 days, p<0.001) prior to first dose of RDV. Incidence of serious AEs, grade ≥3 AEs, and AE leading to discontinuation were similar between groups (Table1). Grade ≥3 hepatobiliary adverse events, particularly transaminase elevations, were not common but numerically higher in the high ALT group (8 8% vs 3 3%, p=0 068) Time to clinical recovery, 2-point clinical improvement, 1-point clinical improvement, room air, and death were similar between groups Conclusion: In severe COVID-19 patients, adverse events and clinical outcomes after RDV initiation were similar among patients with baseline normal ALT and those with elevated ALT (1-5x ULN)(Table Presented).